What Happens When You Pipe a Build Process to less
: Processor Impact
When piping a build process (e.g., make
, gcc
, or npm run build
) to less
, the processor handles the workload as follows:
1. CPU Utilization & Process Scheduling
The build process and
less
run concurrently, connected via a pipe (|
).The CPU splits time between:
The build process (generating output).
less
(displaying/outputting the data).
If the build is CPU-intensive (e.g., compiling code), the system prioritizes it, while
less
mostly waits for input (unless scrolling/searching).
2. Buffering & I/O Impact
Stdout is line-buffered when printing to a terminal but fully buffered when piped.
Build tools (e.g.,
gcc
,make
) may buffer output in chunks, causing slight delays in display.Output appears slower, but actual build speed remains unchanged.
If
less
reads slowly (e.g., manual scrolling), the build process may block temporarily when the pipe buffer fills.
3. Memory Usage
The pipe uses a fixed-size buffer (typically 64KB on Linux).
If
less
doesn’t read fast enough, the build process pauses until buffer space frees.No significant extra memory is used unless
less
loads an extremely large log (rare for builds).
4. Multi-core Systems
On multi-core CPUs:
The build process and
less
can run on separate cores, minimizing interference.Parallel builds (e.g.,
make -j4
) still utilize multiple cores;less
merges their output.
5. Performance Overhead
Piping to
less
adds negligible CPU overhead (only copying data between processes).The main cost is latency: output appears in chunks due to buffering.
Key Takeaways
The processor runs the build at full speed, but output delivery may feel delayed.
For long builds, piping to
less
has almost no performance penalty.For short builds, starting
less
may introduce minor overhead.
Example: Parallel Build with Paging
make -j8 2>&1 | less -R # Uses 8 cores, pipes output to less
The
-j8
flag ensures parallel compilation across 8 cores.less
displays output as it arrives, with minimal CPU impact.